Competing Use Analysis for Offshore Renewables and Subsea Cables

Publicly accessible License 

Demand for abundant and diverse resources in the oceans is growing, necessitating marine spatial planning. To inform development of Marine Hydrokinetic (MHK) and Offshore Wind (OSW) resources, the Department of Energy (DOE) has asked NREL to identify the competing uses areas between promising MHK/OSW sites and submarine power and telecommunications cables. The first step in this work is to identify and quantify the overlap between the MHK/OSW resource availability and existing cable routes.
The analysis is done in terms of resource area because the task of quantifying actual impacts on available resource is a non-trivial undertaking that involves subjective decisions of identifying resource opportunities. Quantifying overlap in-terms of resource area?on the other hand?is significantly more straight forward, and useful to marine spatial planners.
This dataset of polygons describes recommended setback areas from submarine cables for marine renewable energy Development. Two archive files are provided:

1. NREL Cables Setback-Polygons.zip contains the following GeoJSON files:

1.a. cables_100ft.geojson: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 585.301) specifies that the legal right of way for submarine cables is 100 ft (~30 meters) to either side of the cable (i.e., 200 ft wide).

1.b. cables_2z.geojson: The International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) of the North American Submarine Cable Association (NASCA) recommends setback distances for new facilities as the maximum of 500 m or twice the bottom depth (2z), per ICPC Recommendation 13 No. 2 (Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council IV 2014). For depths 250 m, 2 * depth is to be used.

1.c. cables_3z.geojson: The ICPC of NASCA recommends setback distances for new cables as the maximum of 500 m or three times the bottom depth (3z), per ICPC Recommendation 2 No. 10 (Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council IV 2014). So for depths 167 m, 3 * depth is to be used.

2. NREL Submarine Cable Analysis Code Data Presentations.zip contains all files (code, data, README, etc) from release 0.1 of this Github repository for possibly regenerating the product as submarine cable configurations change: https://github.com/ecoquants/nrel-cables.

For more details, please see the link to the full report for which this data product is a supplemental output:

Submarine Cable Analysis for U.S. Marine Renewable Energy Development
by Ben Best and Levi Kilcher
National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - Demand for abundant and diverse resources in the oceans is growing, necessitating marine spatial planning. To inform development of Marine Hydrokinetic (MHK) and Offshore Wind (OSW) resources, the Department of Energy (DOE) has asked NREL to identify the competing uses areas between promising MHK/OSW sites and submarine power and telecommunications cables. The first step in this work is to identify and quantify the overlap between the MHK/OSW resource availability and existing cable routes. The analysis is done in terms of resource area because the task of quantifying actual impacts on available resource is a non-trivial undertaking that involves subjective decisions of identifying resource opportunities. Quantifying overlap in-terms of resource area?on the other hand?is significantly more straight forward, and useful to marine spatial planners. This dataset of polygons describes recommended setback areas from submarine cables for marine renewable energy Development. Two archive files are provided: 1. NREL Cables Setback-Polygons.zip contains the following GeoJSON files: 1.a. cables_100ft.geojson: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 585.301) specifies that the legal right of way for submarine cables is 100 ft (~30 meters) to either side of the cable (i.e., 200 ft wide). 1.b. cables_2z.geojson: The International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) of the North American Submarine Cable Association (NASCA) recommends setback distances for new facilities as the maximum of 500 m or twice the bottom depth (2z), per ICPC Recommendation 13 No. 2 (Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council IV 2014). For depths 250 m, 2 * depth is to be used. 1.c. cables_3z.geojson: The ICPC of NASCA recommends setback distances for new cables as the maximum of 500 m or three times the bottom depth (3z), per ICPC Recommendation 2 No. 10 (Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council IV 2014). So for depths 167 m, 3 * depth is to be used. 2. NREL Submarine Cable Analysis Code Data Presentations.zip contains all files (code, data, README, etc) from release 0.1 of this Github repository for possibly regenerating the product as submarine cable configurations change: https://github.com/ecoquants/nrel-cables. For more details, please see the link to the full report for which this data product is a supplemental output: Submarine Cable Analysis for U.S. Marine Renewable Energy Development by Ben Best and Levi Kilcher National Renewable Energy Laboratory AU - Best, Benjamin A2 - Kilcher, Levi DB - Marine and Hydrokinetic Data Repository DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory DO - 10.15473/1561978 KW - MHK KW - Marine KW - Hydrokinetic KW - energy KW - power KW - submarine cables KW - setbacks KW - polygons KW - technology study KW - submarine cable analysis KW - GeoJSON KW - competing use analysis KW - modeling KW - offshore KW - renewables KW - subsea cables KW - renewable energy KW - NREL LA - English DA - 2019/08/29 PY - 2019 PB - National Renewable Energy Laboratory T1 - Competing Use Analysis for Offshore Renewables and Subsea Cables UR - https://doi.org/10.15473/1561978 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Best, Benjamin, and Levi Kilcher. Competing Use Analysis for Offshore Renewables and Subsea Cables. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 29 August, 2019, Marine and Hydrokinetic Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15473/1561978.
Best, B., & Kilcher, L. (2019). Competing Use Analysis for Offshore Renewables and Subsea Cables. [Data set]. Marine and Hydrokinetic Data Repository. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.15473/1561978
Best, Benjamin and Levi Kilcher. Competing Use Analysis for Offshore Renewables and Subsea Cables. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, August, 29, 2019. Distributed by Marine and Hydrokinetic Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.15473/1561978
@misc{MHKDR_Dataset_314, title = {Competing Use Analysis for Offshore Renewables and Subsea Cables}, author = {Best, Benjamin and Kilcher, Levi}, abstractNote = {Demand for abundant and diverse resources in the oceans is growing, necessitating marine spatial planning. To inform development of Marine Hydrokinetic (MHK) and Offshore Wind (OSW) resources, the Department of Energy (DOE) has asked NREL to identify the competing uses areas between promising MHK/OSW sites and submarine power and telecommunications cables. The first step in this work is to identify and quantify the overlap between the MHK/OSW resource availability and existing cable routes.
The analysis is done in terms of resource area because the task of quantifying actual impacts on available resource is a non-trivial undertaking that involves subjective decisions of identifying resource opportunities. Quantifying overlap in-terms of resource area?on the other hand?is significantly more straight forward, and useful to marine spatial planners.
This dataset of polygons describes recommended setback areas from submarine cables for marine renewable energy Development. Two archive files are provided:

1. NREL Cables Setback-Polygons.zip contains the following GeoJSON files:

1.a. cables_100ft.geojson: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 585.301) specifies that the legal right of way for submarine cables is 100 ft (~30 meters) to either side of the cable (i.e., 200 ft wide).

1.b. cables_2z.geojson: The International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) of the North American Submarine Cable Association (NASCA) recommends setback distances for new facilities as the maximum of 500 m or twice the bottom depth (2z), per ICPC Recommendation 13 No. 2 (Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council IV 2014). For depths 250 m, 2 * depth is to be used.

1.c. cables_3z.geojson: The ICPC of NASCA recommends setback distances for new cables as the maximum of 500 m or three times the bottom depth (3z), per ICPC Recommendation 2 No. 10 (Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council IV 2014). So for depths 167 m, 3 * depth is to be used.

2. NREL Submarine Cable Analysis Code Data Presentations.zip contains all files (code, data, README, etc) from release 0.1 of this Github repository for possibly regenerating the product as submarine cable configurations change: https://github.com/ecoquants/nrel-cables.

For more details, please see the link to the full report for which this data product is a supplemental output:

Submarine Cable Analysis for U.S. Marine Renewable Energy Development
by Ben Best and Levi Kilcher
National Renewable Energy Laboratory}, url = {https://mhkdr.openei.org/submissions/314}, year = {2019}, howpublished = {Marine and Hydrokinetic Data Repository, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.15473/1561978}, note = {Accessed: 2025-05-06}, doi = {10.15473/1561978} }
https://dx.doi.org/10.15473/1561978

Details

Data from Aug 29, 2019

Last updated Jun 1, 2020

Submitted Aug 30, 2019

Organization

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Contact

Ben Best

805.705.9770

Authors

Benjamin Best

EcoQuants LLC

Levi Kilcher

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

DOE Project Details

Project Name Competing Use Analysis for Offshore Renewables and Subsea Cables

Project Lead Hoyt Battey

Project Number FY17 AOP 2140401

Share

Submission Downloads